The concept of what makes an object beautiful plagues modern art. Making people feel like outsiders to what they perceive to be stylised canvases and something ‘that I could make.’ But how does the concept of beauty apply to artwork as objects? Perceived beauty relies on so many categories namely those listed above. Beauty is not essential for artistic creation - though when appealing to the wider masses it tends to.
Beauty is subjective although thought, intention, attention to detail and design play a part. I think it’s fair to say that much like modern art (for the most part) when an object has visceral meaning and intention behind its making and what it stands for, we feel a stronger pull/ connection to it.
Cornelia Parker's artwork ‘30 Pieces of Silver’, explores themes of objecthood, value, and Past lives. In the late 80’s Parker laid out 30 silver objects which she then flattened, culminating in an installation. Where does the inherent value lie? Is it with the individual pieces or with the piece as a whole? Many consider this sacrilege, but isn't it always best to reuse? The presentation of this work in the gallery setting allows us to refer to the payment Judas received for betraying Jesus, as well as the past lives of the people who owned the objects. Is it rejuvenation or destruction?
When art has meaning and intention behind it therefore exploring something you find inspiring, harrowing, interesting and important as the viewer you will find beauty in it despite its aesthetic appeal.