After 20/30 years of just having MILF in our vocabulary, DILF entered... so does this mean that subjecting men alongside women is equality?
The idea of subjecting either gender, based on their appearance, is something that society needs to stop doing. It is not appropriate to subject one gender and not the other, but it's also not appropriate to subject either.
Just because people are now subjecting males, by calling them DILFs, does not make it acceptable to call females MILFs anymore so.
Celebrities, for instance, are brought into these categories when they reach a particular age - usually around the 35-40 bench mark. Those that fill these categories are David Beckham, Jennifer Anniston, Paul Rudd and Pamela Anderson.
People do not tend to compliment them in a nice way anymore; e.g., "Jennifer is wearing a nice dress." They are referred to in more derogative manners like MILFs and DILFs... they may mean this as a compliment but is it?
Saying this, others may see MILFs and DILFs as a compliment, especially those in these categories. Someone who fits the age category may feel left out, or worse about themselves, if they are not referred to as a MILF or a DILF.
So, is it equality to call people both of these acronyms (which means leaving others out) or would it be better if society scrapped them?