So yes, Valentine's is a consumerist holiday.
The hype around the day is paramount to that of any other holiday however there’s something about Valentines that irks me, particularly the insistence that a dinner date is a must. Why not just go out for dinner any other day of the year? A day when the food will probably be cheaper, taste better – since you’re not bombarded with a thousand 'special' Valentine's options and a stressed chef dealing with twice as many customers all expecting their perfect night – you’ll likely have an all-round better experience.
Why not just go out for dinner any other day of the year?
I don’t think there’s any way to deny that companies benefit hugely from Valentines being a commercial holiday. However, there is still the sentiment behind the holiday itself that exists and this, if nothing else, redeems a day that encapsulates corporate greed; making it a holiday worth investing time in.
Will the florist charge you double for a bouquet of red roses? Probably. But in the giving of gifts, or in taking someone out to a restaurant, there’s also a beautiful honesty. It’s a statement: ‘I love this person’. I don’t blame people for buying into the consumerist nature of the holiday, after all we exist in a capitalist society and there’s no escaping it.
After all, we exist in a capitalist society and there’s no escaping it.
Valentines is about both love, and consumerism. One fueling the other, without a relationship there wouldn’t be a date to go on, and without the option of somewhere to go, the date would be a lot cheaper and probably benefit from fewer international corporations trying to drain your bank dry. This doesn't mean I think it's the best idea to go out for food on Valentine's, but if you're prepared for the crowds that come along with any holiday, good luck!