Formula 1’s drivers have launched a rare and pointed criticism of the sport’s governing body, the FIA, with the Grand Prix Drivers’ Association (GPDA) rebuking FIA President Mohammed Ben Sulayem for what they describe as a lack of respect and professionalism. This comes after a series of controversial penalties for driver conduct, with the GPDA calling for more transparency and balance in how the sport regulates its stars.
The flashpoint stems from the FIA’s intensified focus on curbing drivers’ language during press conferences and interviews, a move drivers argue stifles their authenticity. Recent penalties handed to world champion Max Verstappen and Ferrari’s Charles Leclerc for swearing in post-race interviews have highlighted the issue. Verstappen was fined an eye-watering $44,500, sparking outrage among drivers and fans alike. While the FIA insists that these measures uphold Formula 1’s professionalism, the GPDA argues they are heavy-handed and disconnected from the high-pressure realities of the sport.
In a strongly worded statement, the GPDA called on the FIA to consider context when evaluating driver behavior. They argued that emotional outbursts are inevitable in a sport as intense as Formula 1, particularly in the heat of competition. The group also demanded clarity on how fines are used, raising concerns about a lack of transparency in the governing body’s processes.
The GPDA’s statement is significant not just for its content but for its tone. Drivers have historically aired grievances behind closed doors, but the decision to go public underscores the depth of their dissatisfaction. Their criticism extended to Ben Sulayem personally, accusing him of failing to communicate respectfully with drivers and calling for greater professionalism in his leadership.
The backlash isn’t limited to penalties. Verstappen, known for his candid approach, expressed frustration at what he sees as an attack on the raw emotion that makes Formula 1 compelling. Meanwhile, seven-time world champion Lewis Hamilton has publicly criticized Ben Sulayem for comments comparing swearing drivers to rappers. Hamilton labeled the remarks inappropriate and outdated, arguing that they perpetuate harmful stereotypes.
For its part, the FIA has defended its stance, insisting that professionalism is critical to maintaining Formula 1’s global appeal. Ben Sulayem has doubled down on the importance of drivers serving as role models, but the GPDA’s statement signals a growing divide between the governing body and the competitors who are the heart of the sport.
This conflict raises broader questions about governance in Formula 1. Drivers, already subject to immense scrutiny and pressure, feel that their individuality and spontaneity are being stifled by an increasingly rigid regulatory framework. The GPDA’s unified stance suggests that drivers are prepared to push back against what they view as a top-down, overly controlling approach.
As Formula 1’s popularity surges, resolving this tension will be crucial for the sport’s integrity and appeal. With high-profile figures like Verstappen and Hamilton taking a stand, the FIA faces mounting pressure to rebuild trust with its drivers. For now, the GPDA has made one thing clear: the grid is united in its demand for change.
