Due to a weak majority in the legislative branch, Trump has resorted to numerous executive orders to pass his agenda. The IMSL represents only 0.0046 percent of the federal budget and the tourist economy is reliant on museums and libraries, so gutting this institution doesn’t seem to benefit the economy. It begs the question: What is the motive behind this executive order?
An attack on artistic and educational freedom
Whilst not direct cuts to libraries, limiting the IMLS and overworking staff could lead to a dangerous devaluation of the industry. Potential funding cuts, budget slashes and closures to libraries and museums is seen by some as an attack on artistic and educational freedom.
The humanities and arts are just as useful as any other industry – they are made for creativity, and most importantly critical thinking. They encourage deeper analysis, problem-solving and focus, making them essential not disposable. The executive order has serious implications for the future of education, conservation, and American society.
Another issue raised is that removing libraries further heightens the decline of third spaces. Third spaces are environments that exist outside of home and work, and they are significant for social interaction, community, and learning. Libraries offer a free third space – where there is no pressure to buy anything but just exist – and encourage learning through technology, resources and archives.
As one of the most valued federal institutions, this executive order can be subject to judicial review through federal and state courts. Executive orders don’t always succeed and people hold out hope that arts and culture will remain able to flourish.