The Star Wars war: Are the sequels a disappointment? - YES

Gaming editor James Troughton argues that the Star Wars sequals are flawed and that Disney is to blame

James Troughton
9th December 2019
Image: IMDB

The Star Wars franchise is weird, it began with a bang and only improved with its subsequent films, only to be diminished and insulted by its prequels, and then again by its sequels.

It's a trilogy that, in all honesty, probably should've been left alone as a relic of the 80s, a sci-fi surprise that could easily stand the test of time. However, it wasn't, as Disney dug it back up from the grave to spit on its decaying carcass.

Legendary producer and Lucasfilm president since 2012 Kathleen Kennedy. Image:IMDB

For clarity, I loved The Force Awakens (2015), it was a great way to bring people back into the franchise through familiarity. It was a lot like A New Hope which would have been fine had The Last Jedi (2017) changed things up. It should've been a gateway that opened a door to newer and more exciting things but what we got instead was an Empire and Return mixup that's messier than Revenge of the Sith (2005).

My problems mostly stem from The Last Jedi, a film I loved in cinemas but grew to hate the more I watched it. All of the plot threads are jarringly cut, all of the characters are poorly developed and it ends in a way that immediately dooms its sequel. We could jump on the 'fuck Rian Johnson' bandwagon and blame him for everything, but the issues are much deeper rooted than that.

Disney CEO Bob Iger, who oversaw the purchase of Lucasfilm in 2012. Image:IMDB

Kathleen Kennedy is the figurehead, so naturally, she has become a scapegoat for hatred, but a lot of that energy should be directed at the faceless corporation that is Disney, who drag up classics to make hollow live-action remakes and milk their IPs to death. The sequel trilogy wasn't planned out at all, as soon as they gained access to the Star Wars kingdom, they wanted a film out as soon as possible.

Disney should've waited, they should've planned and they should've organised. What we got instead was a sequel helmed by a director with a completely conflicting vision, working on the foundations set by a man who had no eye for the future. It wasn't going to work, it was an impossible task and Rise of the Skywalker is banking on nostalgia to sell. Palpatine returning wasn't thought out, it's a reaction to declining sales. 'Duel of the Fates' in a teaser? All about hooking you on nostalgia so that you ignore the flaws piling up.

Ahsoka, Yoda, Obi-Wan & Anakin as depicted in the canon animated series The Clone Wars (2008-2013. 2014. 2020). The potential of better story organization? Image:IMDB

What went wrong, then? Well, as much as Kennedy has become a scapegoat, there are pieces of evidence to suggest that she has a hand to blame in the state of Star Wars. There's the idea that she went back on Lucas' vision, unlike Filoni who embraced it with the TV side of things. Then there are the reports from Variety that state that she promised creative freedom to filmmakers only to pull the red carpet from under them before strapping the puppet strings onto their backs. Why do you think Solo (2018) and Rise of Skywalker have gone through the ring in terms of crew shifting? Somethings up and that messy production bleeds into the final cut.

Snoke (Andy Serkis), the divisive former Supreme Leader of the First Order. But, was someone else pulling his srings? Image:IMDB

Now, I'm not one of those angry fans that believe Luke was completely ruined as my problem with the sequel films in terms of storytelling stems from the complete blandness of the new characters. Luke, Leia and Han were iconic in their brilliance, and yet Finn, Poe and Rey are completely lacklustre. Finn was wasted in The Last Jedi, Poe was turned into a complete idiot and Rey is a blank slate waiting to be given some personality. Then there's the villain, a complete rehash of Anakin Skywalker, only there's no one better looming beyond. Snoke was a complete joke, and his death was a welcome goodbye.

Dave Filoni: Head of Lucasfilm Animation and former Padawn to George Lucas. Image:IMDB

George Lucas is a great ideas man and a terrible director. His prequels are some of the worst films that I have ever seen, but they spawned a fantastic era that could be delved into in other media. He had an eye for story and it's commendable. The sequels lack that, they have no greater world to build upon, other than a carbon copy of the Original Trilogy with less gusto and personality. Without that brain and heart behind the films, they just feel empty. At least, from the prequels, we got standout stories in The Clone Wars, the games, the comics, etc.

So, how would I fix the sequels? I'd keep Lucas on as a creative consultant for every project, I'd have Filoni in charge or at least holding a bigger slice of the pie and I'd plan the future trilogies out, rather than rushing into them with no clear vision. Feige may not plot every single detail but he has an overarching story in his mind and that's why Marvel works - Star Wars lacks that, and it's so evidently trying to imitate the superhero success, but without the soul or guidance.

Star Wars Episode IX: The Rise of Skywalker is released nationwide on December 19th. Tickets available now.

(Visited 804 times, 1 visits today)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


  1. Oh come on now. The prequels are some of the worst movies you've ever seen? Here are some genuinely horrible films.....any Porky's sequel, the Dumb and Dumber prequel,The Adventures of Hercules, Boggy Creek. I could go on and on. You think the prequels are that bad? You're being dramatic.

  2. Revenge of the Sith was awesome.
    It also had one of the best sword duels in all of Cinema giving Errol Flynn a run for his money.
    The only thing that was bad was Anakin being whiny, in the cartoon show 'the clone wars' Anakin was depicted excellently that's the Anakin character we should have gotten.
    I love the world building and the Jedi's before the fall, and how they self destructed from the original Jedi that we will get in the new series The high Republic.
    They should have went with Lucas original with the new Jedi order happening not destroyed and having Mara Jade and the solos children with Skywalker's child and that storyline with one of the solos kids turning to the dark side that story was a hundred times better.

    By the way Abram said in an interview that Kathleen Kennedy had absolutely no plan on how the trilogy was going to happen she let three different directors write three different stories and somehow is going to string them together as a trilogy.

    I hope her contract is not renewed and she is fired.

    The only two good things that came out of Star wars was the mandalorian which she has nothing to do with and rogue one which was decent.

ReLated Articles
linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram
Copy link
Powered by Social Snap