Building the house you can’t afford: the appeal of cosy games for students amid the housing crisis

Do cosy games imagine a world without capitalism, or imagine a world in which capitalism is cosy?

Zoe Lett
23rd September 2026
Image source: Bian Musiol, Dupe Photos
As students, we are sold the idea that adulthood comes hand in hand with independence. However, finding your own place to live after university often feels like a financially inaccessible, faraway dream to the vast majority amid the housing crisis. At the same time, games such as Animal Crossing offer the fantasy of creating, owning and customising a home when stability outside the game is becoming harder to achieve.

For young people today, home ownership post-university functions as an aspirational lifestyle rather than a realistic one. According to the Nationwide House Price Index, the average UK house price has risen from £1884 in 1953 to £274,930 in 2026, perhaps reflecting a combination of factors including interest rates and housing supply. The consequences of this shift are particularly visible among younger generations; the Institute for Fiscal Studies found the proportion of adults aged 20-40 co-residing with parents has risen by over a third in the last 20 years.

Economically, home ownership represents succeeding financially, but what is just as valuable to mention is the cultural symbolisations of the home. This is a space that marks identity, belonging, stability, control, and as this form of security becomes increasingly difficult for students to attain, the appeal of spaces online becomes particularly significant.

...creating a space that feels distinctly their own.

The appeal of such games is that they are often built around control and customisation, offering environments that can be shaped to preferences. For example, in Animal Crossing, players begin with limited possessions and can gradually acquire customisable exterior options, room expansions, decorations, colour swatches and more, creating a space that feels distinctly their own. For students, this provides an escape and a temporary experience of creating a home that real life may not offer.

Cosy games are also appealing for younger generations as they largely remove the pressure of failure; unlike games built around competition and difficult objectives, cosy games rarely punish players. There is not definitive way to ‘win’ Animal Crossing, creating a low-pressure environment, which can be particularly attractive to students whose life contradicts this notion.

This lack of pressure provides a temporary break from the stresses of everyday life; their slow and repetitive features can create a sense of calm and cosiness that contrasts with the demands of university life. Progress is therefore gradual and largely determined by the player themselves. 

These cosy games don’t really portray an overly fantasy world, but rather a fantasy of material security with no real-world barriers. However, it could be argued that they should not just be understood as escapist spaces from the anxieties of students, but as cultural spaces in which anxieties are negotiated and reproduced. Animal Crossing’s sense of security is achieved through the same systems of labour, consumption, debt and accumulation as a real-life capitalist society. Despite it's emphasis on relaxation, the player’s progression is organised around capitalist principles; the mundane activities that make the game ‘cosy’ such as fishing and gardening is converted into currency, therefore transforming economic activity into something pleasurable and rewarding. Debt and labour are presented not as sources of anxiety, but as manageable steps towards creating a home.

On one hand, cosy games allow players to temporarily escape the economic anxieties of the housing crisis by providing control over money and the domestic space. On the other hand, this fantasy is not necessarily escaping capitalism altogether but escaping its consequences. In this sense, cosy gaming can be understood as both an escape from capitalism and a simulation of it; a version of capitalism made comfortable enough to play.

AUTHOR: Zoe Lett
Head of Culture 26/27 | Film Sub-Editor 25/26

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

ReLated Articles
[related_post]
magnifiercross
linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram
Copy link
Powered by Social Snap