Murder Among the Mormons - a series of unexplored promise

Autumn Lily reviews the slightly-underwhelming new True Crime series to hit Netflix

Autumn Lily
10th March 2021
Credit: IMDb, Wikimedia Commons
In the second episode of Murder Among the Mormons, there is a two-minute-long reenactment where two of the show’s main figures drive into the Utah countryside and shoot an Uzi Submachine gun at an abandoned house. These two minutes are the best this docu-series has to offer as it encapsulates the absurdity of this unusual crime story. The same cannot be said for the remaining three hours of episodes.

Released last Wednesday, Murder Among the Mormons appears to be a new addition to Netflix’s cache of niche true crime documentaries, and at its surface this documentary promises to explore the well known themes of this genre- cults, the absurd, and of course - murder. It covers the topic of the 1985 Utah Bombings, a story that blends forgery, homicide and the controversial Mormon Church. Although this subject matter is undeniably unusual, the style of the series is disappointingly conventional.

Shannon Flynn was one of the highlights of the series. Credit: Netflix on YouTube.

The directors introduce us to everyone we expect to meet, a mix of experts, witnesses, members of the Mormon community and the police officers involved, without attempting to draw anything exceptional out of these overwhelmingly, old, white and male figures. The only notable mention is Shannon Flynn, a larger than life figure, dressed in a waistcoat with an unusual way of speaking, a Mormon who was caught at the heart of the action. Promotional tweets from Netflix have already attempted to turn him into a meme, using stills from the documentary to create reaction photos.

This series seems to call on all the hallmarks of documentary practice without adding anything new

Although Flynn is an eccentric figure, this portrayal of him feels forced against the background of an unspectacular cast, and he is just not riveting enough to carry the documentary on his back alone. These interviews are paired with a mix of archive footage and unremarkable reenactment scenes, a trope so commonly used it is difficult to make it different- and that is not achieved here.

The series didn't criticise the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints much. Credit: Netflix on YouTube.

This series seems to call on all the hallmarks of documentary practice without adding anything new, and the striking story it embarks to tell is thus muted. It is often detective work in itself to work out where on the timeline we are, or which real person is supposed to be who in the reenactment.

It might be said the series verges on propaganda

It is a documentary that divulges far too much detail about specific facts, but too little about the overall themes. Barely any time, for example, is spent on fleshed out criticism of the Mormon church, which may have added a greater complexity to the crimes committed within it.

This may be down to the co-director’s Mormon identity, and it might be said the series verges on propaganda, as the final image of the Church of Latter-day Saints is of a peaceful community left ravaged by the evil perpetrator. Elsewhere, in the final moments of the film, it is revealed the criminal mastermind at its centre may have spuriously written Emily Dickenson prose- this astounding fact is never expanded on.

Ultimately I finished this series feeling unsatisfied, finding greater clarity on the event’s Wikipedia page.

Credit: Netflix on YouTube.
(Visited 101 times, 1 visits today)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


ReLated Articles
linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram
Copy link
Powered by Social Snap