Notre-Damn or Notre-Nah: New look of the iconic cathedral

One of our sports sub-editors debates whether the Notre Dame rebuild is any good.

Noelia Fernández Pérez
15th January 2025
Pexels_MaxAvans

One of the most iconic landmarks in Paris, Notre Dame Cathedral has long stood as a symbol of French history, art, and resilience. After a devastating fire in April 2019 caused severe damage to the centuries-old structure, the question on everyone’s lips was: What will Notre Dame's future look like?

For many, the restoration of this iconic landmark was a moment of national pride and an opportunity to preserve a masterpiece that had withstood centuries of change. But after seeing the final product of its restoration, I can’t help but feel that the new look of Notre-Dame is more of a disappointing misstep than a triumph of craftmanship.

The most obvious issue is the decision to replicate the 19th-century spire designed by Eugène Viollet-le-Duc. Although his work was undeniably a masterpiece in its own right, the idea of recreating it exactly, rather than returning the spire to its medieval origins, seems misguided.

The gothic cathedral’s original design, with its sweeping lines and intricate details, no longer feels cohesive with the modern, almost sterile finish of the new spire, which is constructed from materials like stainless steel. The sleekness of the new spire’s design clashes with the centuries-old stonework of the cathedral, creating an uncomfortable visual discord.

And then there’s the matter of the cathedral’s overall restoration. While the structural integrity of the building has been preserved, much of the craftmanship feels more like a glossed-over attempt to ‘update’ the building than to faithfully restore it. Instead of a building that has withstood the test of time, we’re left with a shiny, almost clinical version of what was once a majestic, awe-inspiring site.

Notre-Dame has always been a monument to human history, not to the idea of perfection. In trying so hard to restore the cathedral to an idealised vision, the restoration feels more like an artificial facelift than a respectful tribute to its legacy. For a building that represents centuries of struggle, faith, and resilience, the new look seems out of place-too polished, too sanitised, and lacking the soul that made Notre-Dame so unforgettable in the first place.

In the end, the question must be asked: did we preserve the spirit of Notre-Dame, or did we simply make it look pretty? As much as we may want to celebrate the rebuilding of this national treasure, the final result leaves me wondering if the cathedral’s original character hasn’t been lost forever.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

ReLated Articles
[related_post]
magnifiercross
linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram
Copy link
Powered by Social Snap