Oxford SU to lobby for trigger warnings

Alex Walker outlines his concerns for a motion passed recently in the Oxford University Student Council

Alex Walker
17th May 2020
Image: Oxford Union on YouTube

After a vote at their Student Council, Oxford University Student Union are to lobby for reading lists which contain hate speech against any group to come with trigger warnings. Okay. There's a lot to dissect there.

They are also arguing that students should not be forced to engage with any “hateful material”. This means they should not be required to attend any lectures, tutorials or seminars or sit any exams which involve “hate speech”. Okay, even more. That’s fine. We can do this in… 200 words.

Trigger warnings are, in my opinion, essential. As an English student, my course requires an engagement with material that is often extreme, and for certain people that can be incredibly hard. But to say that students should not have to study or be examined on any hateful material - essentially meaning it has to be excluded from the course - is absurdist. As a proud snowflake, even I have to admit that this is ridiculous.

Studying hateful material is not important: it is essential

Within history and politics, or any humanities subject, study of hateful material is essential. Not necessary, or important, but essential. To not study anything concerning hate speech is whitewashing. It looks away from things because they are hard, and involves ignoring stuff that we, the human race, have always done. Bad stuff. Stuff that we might not do again if we remember, study, and talk about it. The motion put forward by the Oxford SU degrades any subject, and renders it a parody of itself. It has the potential to raise a generation of academics who think we live in a meadow of wildflowers and fluffy unicorns. They might forget that that meadow has a Nazi genocide in the corner, or a black teenager lynched on a tree.

If we don't engage with humanity's flaws, we can't try to fix them

The hardest part is accepting that, though the meadow might be flawed, it is still beautiful, and worthy of making better. If you don’t acknowledge the flaws, you can’t try to fix them, which is all the human race needs to do to keep on going. Removing hateful material makes this impossible.

I hate to be like Piers Morgan, calling things woke and absurd, but come on. Why do we have academics if not for difficult material?

(Visited 25 times, 1 visits today)
AUTHOR: Alex Walker
An English Literature student, who enjoys playing devils advocate. Interested in sharing my vacuous opinion on Film, TV, Music, Sports, and Political history. Find me on Facebook if you want write a piece together, or just want to tell me my articles are rubbish somewhere Zuckerberg can hear. Twitter, @TheAlexJLWalker

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

ReLated Articles
magnifiercross
linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram
Copy link
Powered by Social Snap